link to Rural Assistance Center Homepage skip navigation
Funding Information
Guides
News &
Events
Experts &
Organizations
Publications
& Maps
Success
Stories
State
Resources

Frontier Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What is the definition of frontier?

Answer: Frontier areas are sparsely populated rural areas that are isolated from population centers and services. While frontier is sometimes defined simplistically as places having a population density of six or fewer people per square mile this does not take into account some important factors that may isolate a community. Therefore, other definitions are more complex and address isolation by considering distance in miles and travel time in minutes to services.

Definitions of frontier for specific state and federal programs vary, depending on the purpose of the project being researched or funded. Some of the issues that may be considered in classifying an area as frontier include population density, distance from a population center or specific service, travel time to reach a population center or service, functional association with other places, availability of paved roads, and seasonal changes in access to services. Frontier may be defined at the county level, by ZIP code or by census tract.

Rural-Urban Commuting Areas (RUCAs) can be used to identify very remote areas, which could be considered frontier-like due to their isolation from population centers. Under the RUCA definition, types of rural and urban are defined by proximity to urban areas and the portion of the population that commute for work from place to place. For instance, a RUCA code of 10 is assigned to isolated, small rural census tracts. The WWAMI Rural Health Research Center publication RUCA Data: Travel Distance and Time, Remote, Isolated, and Frontier discusses a method of combining the Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes with travel distance to urban areas and larger rural towns, in order to identify areas that are very remote. RUCAs are available by census tract and by ZIP code area. RUCA Version 1 uses 1990 Census and 1998 ZIP code areas, while Version 2 uses 2000 Census data and 2004 ZIP code areas. RUCAs were first introduced in a 1999 article by Richard Morrill, John Cromartie, and Gary Hart - "Metropolitan, Urban, and Rural Commuting Areas: Toward a Better Depiction of the United States Settlement System." Urban Geography 20: 727-748.

In 2006, with funding from the Health Resources and Services Administration's Office for the Advancement of Telehealth, an expert panel developed a new frontier area definition that could be applied to telehealth programs. The frontier definition and the process by which it was developed are described in the report, Defining the Term “Frontier Area” for Programs Implemented through the Office for the Advancement of Telehealth. The recommended frontier area definition from the panel is: "ZIP code areas whose calculated population centers are more than 60 minutes or 60 miles along the fastest paved road trip to a short-term non federal general hospital of 75 beds or more, and are not part of a large rural town with a concentration of over 20,000 population." This report also provides an overview of other currently used frontier definitions.

The National Center for Frontier Communities, formerly known as the Frontier Education Center, in 1997-98 brought together a multi-disciplinary group of experts as a consensus group that developed a matrix for determining frontier status, based on population density, distance to the closest "market" for services, and travel time. State Offices of Rural Health participate in determining the areas considered frontier in each state. For more detailed description of this frontier definition, please see the Frontier: A New Definition. A number of other documents analyzing frontier areas and the “consensus” definition are found on the National Center for Frontier Communities website Developing the Consensus Definition.

More information about the challenges of defining non-metropolitan areas is available on the What is Rural? information guide.

Question: How much of the U.S. is frontier?

Answer: Frontier is more of a concept than a specific definition, so the number of people living in the frontier and the amount of land that is frontier will vary depending on the definition you select. The North Carolina Rural Health Research and Policy Analysis Center's map, Frontier Counties, United States, 2004, identifies 440 counties that meet the frontier definition of fewer than seven people per square mile, with a total population for those counties of nearly 2.9 million people. Based on the USDA Economic Research Service's Measuring Rurality: Urban Influence Codes, over three million people live in rural counties that are not adjacent to a metropolitan or micropolitan county (having an Urban Influence Code of 11 or 12), and these counties cover an area of over 770,000 square miles. Using the counties and areas provided to the National Center for Frontier Communities by the State Offices of Rural Health, 56% of the land area of the United States is frontier and more than 9 million people, or less than 4% of the population of the country live in these isolated areas.

Question: How can I find out if my county is a frontier county?

Answer: There are several answers to this question.

You can determine if your county meets the "six or fewer people per square mile" definition of frontier by using the U.S. Census Bureau's State and County Quick Facts. Select your state and then your county. Scroll down to the Geography Quick Facts section near the bottom of the page and look for "Persons per square mile."

You can use the National Center for Frontier Communities' List of Frontier Counties from the 2000 U.S. Census. You may also want to review their Frontier Designation Matrix, which describes how frontier status is calculated by the State Offices of Rural Health and reported to the National Center for Frontier Communities.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service provides a list of Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes for each state. A RUCA code of 10 is assigned to isolated, small rural census tracts. The WWAMI Rural Health Research Center offers state and regional maps based on RUCA data.

Question: What are some of the challenges facing frontier areas?

Answer: The isolation and distances that classify an area as frontier results in long trips to attend school, shop for groceries, get health care, and reach other basic services. Public transportation options are often limited or unavailable in frontier areas, making access to needed services difficult for low-income households, the elderly and disabled. Frontier areas face seasonal travel barriers that can make travel difficult. For those living in mountainous areas, some roads and passes may be closed in winter, leading to longer travel times. Residents may find that winter driving in the frontier extends travel times because they need to slow down to adequately account for road conditions and limited visibility. Flooding caused by melting snow and heavy rains can force the closer of main roads for unexpected and extended periods of time in both mountainous and flatland landscapes. Some island residents and residents of roadless areas are limited to air access, when airplanes are able to fly.

The economy in frontier areas is usually based on a few specific resources or activities and so are more at risk of downturns and boom-bust cycles. Tourism, farming, ranching, logging, and mining are some of the businesses that are common in rural areas. Frontier communities may be more vulnerable to less desirable sources of business income, such as nuclear waste disposal. Frontier areas where much of the land is federally owned may lack an adequate tax base to pay for needed services.

The USDA's Economic Research Service report, Understanding Rural Population Loss, notes that counties with low population density, such as frontier counties, are most at risk for population loss. Communities with cultural or natural amenities are likely to fare better than remote communities that have fewer attractions to offer tourists and retirees.

Question: What are some of the health care challenges in frontier areas?

Answer: The National Center for Frontier Communities' publication Addressing the Nursing Shortage: Impacts and Innovations in Frontier America notes that over 30% of frontier counties lack a hospital. Frontier counties that do have hospitals may face higher costs than non-frontier hospitals, due to the lower volume of patients served. Frontier counties with nurse shortages or no hospitals are often clustered together, compounding the distance residents must travel to reach a hospital.

Frontier areas face the same difficulties as other rural areas in maintaining their health care workforce. These thinly populated regions cannot easily compete with the wages and amenities offered to physicians and nurses by hospitals and clinics in metropolitan areas. Even communities that do have adequate staffing are often one doctor or nurse away from a shortage.  For more information, please see our guide on Health Care Workforce.

Some areas must cope with seasonal variations in health care needs, when the population surges with tourists or retirees. Limited health resources in frontier areas, including volunteer health services and costly evacuation services, may be needed to care for people vacationing in the area, taking away from the resources available for local residents. For more information, please see the Seasonal Population Fluctuations in Rural and Frontier Areas: Phase One: The View from State Offices of Rural Health and Impact of Seasonal Population Variations on Frontier Communities: Maintenance of the Healthcare Infrastructure.

Rural communities are at higher risk for substance abuse among youth, higher motor vehicle fatalities, hypertension, cigarette smoking, suicide, and death from serious injuries. While many studies have identified health disparities for all rural communities, fewer have focused specifically on the remote rural areas of the frontier. The National Center for Frontier Communities' report, Frontier Youth: Living on the Edge, provides an overview of the behavioral health issues facing frontier youth, using rural data where frontier-specific data is not available, but with discussion that focuses on frontier. According to the December 2003 working paper from the WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, "Prevalence and Trends in Smoking: A National Rural Study," 24.9 percent of residents in remote rural areas smoke, compared to 22 percent in urban areas. Obesity in remote, rural areas tends to be higher than in urban areas, and a college education may have less impact in these remote areas to reduce levels of obesity (A National Study of Obesity Prevalence and Trends by Type of Rural County, Journal of Rural Health, Spring 2005.)

Question: How can telehealth services help frontier areas?

Answer: Telehealth, the provision of health services over a distance through the use of technology, can help frontier communities connect with health care services and specialists that would otherwise be unavailable or require travel. Some of the telehealth applications that can benefit frontier communities include telemental health and telepharmacy. The availability and cost of telecommunications access are potential barriers to the use of telehealth in frontier areas. For more information on this technology, see the Technology information guide and the Telehealth information guide.

Question: Are there funding or reimbursement advantages to being considered a frontier area?

Answer: Most of the programs that frontier areas can access for grants and enhanced reimbursement are available through shortage designations, including the Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) and Medically Underserved Area (MUA) designations, rather than through a designation as a frontier area. The Community Health Center program gives special consideration to sparsely populated or frontier areas. One program that is specific to frontier is the Frontier Extended Stay Clinic (FESC) Cooperative Agreement Program. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) also has a project for the FESC model, the Frontier Extended Stay Clinic Demonstration Project.

Frontier communities are rural and so qualify for many rural-specific funding programs, such as the Office of Rural Health Policy's Rural Health Care Services Outreach Grant Program and Rural Health Network Development Grant Program. For additional funding programs available to frontier and other rural areas, please see our Funding section.

Question: What is a Frontier Extended Stay Clinic (FESC)?

Answer: The Frontier Extended Stay Clinic (FESC) is being considered as a new provider type to better meet the needs of remote communities far from a hospital. This program is currently a cooperative agreement program in Alaska and Washington. The FESC designation allows a primary care clinic located in a remote area to provide and be reimbursed for monitoring and observation of patients for a limited period of time, in cases where patients cannot or should not be transferred. For more information, please see the Office of Rural Health Policy's Frontier Extended Stay Clinic (FESC) Cooperative Agreement Program.


Credits

Mary Amundson, University of North Dakota, Center for Rural Health, Mary Wakefield, formerly of the University of North Dakota, Center for Rural Health, Carol Miller, National Center for Frontier Communities, and Thomas C. Ricketts, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research.
Past contributors: Gary Hart, WWAMI Rural Health Research Center

Sources: Addressing the Nursing Shortage: Impacts and Innovations in Frontier America, Frontier Education Center; Bridging the Health Divide: The Rural Public Health Research Agenda, Frontier Education Center; Focusing on "Frontier": Isolated Rural America, Frontier Mental Health Services Resource Network; Frontier: A New Definition, Frontier Education Center; Frontier Youth: Living on the Edge, Frontier Education Center; Health Care in Frontier America: A Time for Change, Office of Rural Health Policy; A National Study of Obesity Prevalence and Trends by Type of Rural County. Journal of Rural Health 21 (Spring (2) 2005); 140-148; Prevalence and Trends in Smoking: A National Rural Study. WWAMI Rural Health Research Center: December 2003; Understanding Rural Population Loss, Economic Research Service.

 

Maintained by: Kathy Spencer, kathy@raconline.org

Last revised 04/16/2009